Bibliographic Data
Year of Study
2025
Publication
EdWorkingPapers.com
This study examines the impact of using instructionally aligned literacy tutoring with students in kindergarten
through third grade under a Response to Intervention framework. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to
evaluate the impact on literacy assessment scores for 296 students in four schools in a large suburban school
district in the southeastern United States. Students in the treatment group received tutoring where strategies and
materials were aligned with core instruction, while those in the control group received tutoring that used
supplemental strategies and materials that were distinct from core instruction. We find that students in the
treatment group score an average of 0.12 standard deviations higher than the students in the control group.
Exploratory analyses reveal that instructional alignment appears to have a greater impact on boys and
lower-performing students. Additional exploratory analyses suggest the treatment effect is stronger when
delivered in groups of four and by tutors who do not hold a master’s degree
Research Design
Study Design
Quantitative
Methodology
Randomized Controlled Trial
Subject
Reading
Grade Level(s)
Kindergarten,
1st Grade,
2nd Grade,
3rd Grade
Sample size
296
Effect Size
Students who were tutored using pedagogy that matched their classroom instruction performed 0.12 SD higher than students whose tutoring did not match the classroom instruction
Program Details
Program Name
Benchmark Advance
Program Evaluated
Benchmark Advance
Tutor Type
Teachers/Paras
Duration
10+ wks
Student-Tutor Ratio
1:~3-4