Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis

Bibliographic Data

Author(s)
M Pellegrini, C Lake, A Neitzel, RE Slavin
Year of Study
2021
Publication
Sage Journals
This article reviews research on the achievement outcomes of elementary mathematics programs; 87 rigorous experimental studies evaluated 66 programs in grades K–5. Programs were organized in six categories. Particularly positive outcomes were found for tutoring programs (effect size [ES] = +0.20, k = 22). Positive outcomes were also seen in studies focused on professional development for classroom organization and management (e.g., cooperative learning; ES = +0.19, k = 7). Professional development approaches focused on helping teachers gain in understanding of mathematics content and pedagogy had little impact on student achievement. Professional development intended to help in the adoption of new curricula had a small but significant impact for traditional (nondigital) curricula (ES = +0.12, k = 7), but not for digital curricula. Traditional and digital curricula with limited professional development, as well as benchmark assessment programs, found few positive effects

Research Design

Study Design
Meta-Analysis
Methodology
Meta-Analysis
Subject
Math
Grade Level(s)
Kindergarten,
1st Grade,
2nd Grade,
3rd Grade,
4th Grade,
5th Grade
Sample size
22 studies (about tutoring)
Effect Size
0.20SD increase (0.30SD for small group, 0.19SD for 1:1, no signficiant difference between small group and 1:1). No significant difference between tutoring my cerified teachers (0.22SD) and teaching assistants (0.16SD)

Program Details

Tutor Type
Teachers, TAs, paid volunteers
Duration
At least 12 wks long
Student-Tutor Ratio
1:1 or 1:small group