Bibliographic Data
Year of Study
2024
Publication
EconStor
Recent research suggests that using additional teachers to provide small-group instruction or
tutoring substantially improves student learning. However, treatment effects on test scores can
fade over time, and less is known about the lasting effects of such interventions. We leverage data
from a Norwegian large-scale field experiment to examine the effects of small-group instruction
in mathematics for students aged 7-9. This intervention shares many features with other highimpact tutoring programs, with some notable exceptions: instruction time was kept fixed, it had a
lower dosage, and it targeted students of all ability levels. The latter allows us to assess fadeout
across the ability distribution. Previous research on this intervention finds positive short-run
effects. This paper shows that about 60% of the effect persists 3.5 years later. The effect size and
degree of fadeout are surprisingly similar across the ability distribution. The study demonstrates
that small-group instruction in mathematics successfully targets student performance and that
effects can be sustained over time.
Research Design
Study Design
Quantitative
Methodology
Randomized Controlled Trial
Subject
Math
Grade Level(s)
1st Grade,
2nd Grade,
3rd Grade
Sample size
5818 (this was the smallest sample used, the study also used larger samples for other questions)
Effect Size
0.13 SD increase 5 months after tutoring ends, 0.08SD increase 3.5 yrs after tutoring ends
Program Details
Program Name
1+1 Project
Tutor Type
Qualified teachers
Duration
2 x 4-6wks every year
Student-Tutor Ratio
1:4-1:6