Bibliographic Data
Year of Study
2019
Publication
Taylor & Francis Online
This meta-analysis systematically reviewed the most up-to-date literature to determine the effectiveness of reading interventions on measures of word and pseudoword reading, reading comprehension, and
passage fluency, and to determine the role intervention and study variables play in moderating the impacts for students at risk for reading
difficulties in Grades 1–3. We used random-effects meta-regression
models with robust variance estimates to summarize overall effects
and to explore potential moderator effects. Results from a total of 33
rigorous experimental and quasi-experimental studies conducted
between 2002 and 2017 that met WWC evidence standards revealed a
significant positive effect for reading interventions on reading outcomes, with a mean effect size of 0.39 (SE ¼ .04, p < .001, 95%
CI [0.32, 0.46]). Moderator analyses demonstrated that mean effects
varied across outcome domains and areas of instruction.
Research Design
Study Design
Meta-Analysis
Methodology
Meta-Analysis
Subject
Reading
Grade Level(s)
1st Grade,
2nd Grade,
3rd Grade
Sample size
33 studies
Effect Size
0.39SD overall, no significant impact from who does the tutoring, if there is "monitoring and feedback" (p.17), or hours/wk, or tutor:student ratio
Program Details
Duration
No shorter than 8 hours
Student-Tutor Ratio
1:1 or 1:2-1:5