Bibliographic Data
Year of Study
2024
Publication
Taylor & Francis Online
ABSTRACT
Purpose: An inferential comprehension intervention addressing reading
comprehension difficulties of middle schoolers was tested.
Method: Students in Grades 6 to 8 (n = 145; 53.8% female; 71% White; 24%
Black) who failed their state literacy test, were randomly assigned to tutorled, computerized, or business-as-usual [BaU] interventions.
Results: The tutor-led intervention produced significant effects compared to
BaU (g = .40) and computer-led (g = .30) on inference types instructed in the
intervention. Students with adequate word reading in tutor-led gained more
compared to BaU on WIAT-III Reading Comprehension. Boys gained more
from tutor-led and BaU vs. computer-led on several measures.
Conclusion: Inferential comprehension is malleable in middle school, but
adequate word reading may be important. The effects for boys vs. girls
suggest the need to understand intervention factors beyond the content
and instructional procedures of interventions. Findings are discussed with
reference to theories of inference and reading comprehension as well as the
literature on technology-aided literacy interventions
Research Design
Study Design
Quantitative
Methodology
Randomized Controlled Trial
Subject
Reading
Grade Level(s)
6th Grade,
7th Grade,
8th Grade
Sample size
145
Effect Size
Tutoring vs. BaU: 0.40 SD; Tutoring vs. Computer-Led: 0.30 SD; Computer led vs. BAU: 0.09 SD
Program Details
Tutor Type
Human tutoring
Student-Tutor Ratio
For human-tutoring: 1:2-1:6 (median 1:3)
For computer tutoring (w/ human present): 1:1
For computer tutoring (w/ human present): 1:1