Section 5: Build Your Own Program

Building your own high-impact tutoring program from the ground up can create a sustainable, customized, and integrated experience. Creating an internal program by leaning on existing resources and school strengths can streamline the development process by eliminating the need to communicate with an external provider.  This section explains essential elements required for district-led high-impact tutoring programs. 

The content is organized into five components:

Research Insights

Research provides the following guidance to create effective tutoring programs:

5.2 Designing Your Model and Pilot

  • Successful tutoring programs follow structured design principles that ensure instructional coherence and maximize student achievement.
    • For older students, it is recommended to have session lengths of 30 to 60 minutes, while younger students may thrive with shorter sessions.
    • In terms of session frequency, it is recommended to schedule three or more sessions per week for a minimum duration of ten weeks.
    • Frequent assessments of the program help tailor instruction to student needs.
    • Scalable support systems depend on replicable tutoring structures that produce lasting impacts.

5.3 Selecting and Using High-Quality Instructional Materials

5.4 Recruiting and Selecting Tutors

5.5 Training and Supporting Tutors

Read the Full Research

Bisht, B., LeClair, Z., Loeb, S., & Sun, M. (2021). Paraeducators: Growth, Diversity and a Dearth of Professional Supports. Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/nk1z-c164

Cortes, K. E., Kortecamp, K., Loeb, S., & Robinson, C. D. (2025). A scalable approach to high-impact tutoring for young readers. Learning and Instruction, 95, 102021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102021

Fryer, R. G., Jr. (2016). The production of human capital in developed countries: Evidence from 196 randomized field experiments. Harvard University and NBER. Retrieved from https://scholar.harvard.edu/sites/scholar.harvard.edu/files/fryer/files/handbook_fryer_03.25.2016.pdf

Makori, A., Burch, P., & Loeb, S. (2024). Scaling high-impact tutoring: School-level perspectives on implementation challenges and strategies. EdWorkingPaper No. 24-923. Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/h8z5-t461

Nickow, A., Oreopoulos, P., & Quan, V. (2020). The impressive effects of tutoring on PreK-12 learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the experimental evidence (NBER Working Paper No. 27476). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27476 

Podolsky, A., Kini, T., Bishop, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Solving the teacher shortage: How to attract and retain excellent educators. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/262.960

Robinson, C. D., Kraft, M. A., Loeb, S., & Schueler, B. (2024). Design principles for accelerating student learning with high-impact tutoring (EdResearch for Action Brief No. 30). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://studentsupportaccelerator.org/sites/default/files/EdResearch%20Accelerating%20Student%20Learning%20With%20High-Impact%20Tutoring.pdf 

Schwartz, S. (2023, February 27). Why connecting tutoring to curriculum could make it more effective. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/why-connecting-tutoring-to-curriculum-could-make-it-more-effective/2023/02

White, S., Groom-Thomas, L., & Loeb, S. (2023). A systematic review of research on tutoring implementation: Considerations when undertaking complex instructional supports for students (EdWorkingPaper No. 22-652). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/wztf-wj14 

Tutoring Quality Standards

High-quality tutoring programs align with key standards that support effective implementation and student success. Learn more about the research and application of the tutoring quality standards relevant to this section: