When two teams unite around a shared vision, time is needed to foster that relationship and synchronize efforts. The optimal environment for student success through high-impact tutoring is built on transparent, relationship-driven, and proactive collaboration. This collaborative foundation is dependent on a robust communication plan that prioritizes not just open dialogue, but targeted conversations on critical decisions that drive student impact. Section 4.5 provides resources to facilitate a proactive and relationship-based collaboration between the district/school and provider(s).
| BEFORE YOU BEGIN | |
To ensure a strong collaboration with a provider, complete the following task:
|
| DISTRICT/SCHOOL AND PROVIDER COLLABORATION | |
| Key Recommendations | Corresponding Resources |
| Template: District/Provider Kickoff Meeting Agenda (PDF Available) Template: School/Provider Kickoff Meeting Agenda (PDF Available) Template: School/Provider Ongoing Data Meeting Agenda (PDF Available) |
| One-Pager: How to Use Student Data to Improve K-12 Tutoring Playbook Subsection: 3.3 Engaging Stakeholders |
| Playbook Subsection: 6.5 Building in Continuous Improvement Reading: District Collaborator Considerations for Provider Meetings |
| MULTIPLE PROVIDER COLLABORATION | |
| Key Recommendations | Corresponding Resources |
| Template: Multiple Provider Meetings: Collaboration Topics |
| |
| PLANNING FOR LONG TERM | |
|
| Tutoring Quality Standards and Self-Assessment Indicators | |
| Take the free, 15-minute, and research-based Local Education Agency (LEA) Self-Assessment. This subsection addresses these tutoring quality standards and Self-Assessment indicators. | |
| Cohesion Leader Role Clarity | The program has clearly defined roles and responsibilities for the leadership team, with particular attention to clearly defining tutor coaching responsibilities. |
| 6b.5 | A clear performance management system that outlines expectations and processes for promotion and for performance issues | |
| Data Use Program Effectiveness and Improvement | The program has demonstrated a commitment to understanding overall program effectiveness and processes for ongoing improvement. |
| 2a.3 | Process for continuous improvement using both qualitative and quantitative data 2a.4 | Process for collecting, analyzing, and responding to feedback from a diverse group of stakeholders (families, students, tutors, and school faculty) 2a.5 | Process for making adjustments to program design and instructional design based on program and student achievement data | |
| Data Use Student Progress Measure | The program has a system for measuring individual student progress over time and responding to those results; measures of progress include academic growth and adaptive indicators (i.e., student engagement and confidence). |
| 2c.3 | Defined timeline for collecting, analyzing, and responding to data 2c.4 | Defined protocols for collecting, analyzing, and responding to data | |