SEARCH & FILTER

Research Studies

This tool allows education practitioners and researchers to quickly access quantitative research on tutoring program effectiveness. These 200+ research studies were selected due to their rigorous research designs which align with What Works Clearinghouse and Every Student Succeeds Act standards for moderate and strong evidence of intervention efficacy. Many studies were originally identified by their inclusion in recent meta-analyses (Baye et al., 2018; Neitzel et al., 2021; Nickow et al., 2020). Research may be sorted by grade level, subject, and tutor type in order to explore the evidence base for particular program designs. This database does not include qualitative research on best practices for tutoring implementation, for which we recommend exploring our District Playbook and Toolkit for Tutoring Programs.


Displaying 61 - 90 of 289


Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K-6: A systematic review
. (2021). Jens Dietrichson, Trine Filges, Julie K. Seerup, Rasmus H. Klokker, Bjørn C. A. Viinholt, Martin Bøg, Misja Eiberg. Wiley


Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis. (2021). M Pellegrini, C Lake, A Neitzel, RE Slavin. Sage Journals


Success for all: A quantitative synthesis of US evaluations. (2021). Cheung, A. C., Xie, C., Zhuang, T., Neitzel, A. J., & Slavin, R. E.. Taylor and Francis


A blueprint for scaling tutoring and mentoring across public schools. (2021). Kraft, M. A., & Falken, G. T.. Sage Journals


A cautionary tale of tutoring hard-to-reach students in Kenya. (2021). Schueler, B. E., & Rodriguez-Segura, D.. EdWorkingPapers.com


High-Dosage Tutoring and Reading Achievement: Evidence from New York City. (2020). Fryer Jr, Roland G., and Meghan Howard-Noveck. . University of Chicago Press Journals


A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Descubriendo la Lectura. (2020). GD Borman, TH Borman, SJ Park, S Houghton. Sage Journals


Improving working memory Evaluation report and executive summary. (2019). Wright, W. Dorsett, R., Anders, J., Buzzeo, J, Runge, J., & Sanders, M.


Evaluation Report. (2019). Nunes, T., Malmberg, L., Evans, D., Sanders-Ellis, D., Baker, S., Barros, R., Bryant, P., & Evangelou, M.


Does an integrated focus on fractions and decimals improve at-risk students’ rational number magnitude performance? . (2019). Malone, A. S., Fuchs, L. S., Sterba, S. K., Fuchs, D., & Foreman-Murray, L.


Efficacy of a Word- and Text-Based Intervention for Students With Significant Reading Difficulties. (2019). Vaughn, S., Roberts, G. J., Miciak, J., Taylor, P., & Fletcher, J. M.


Effectiveness of an extracurricular program for struggling readers: A comparative study with parent tutors and volunteer tutors. (2019). Villiger, C., Hauri, S., Tettenborn, A., Hartmann, E., Näpflin, C., Hugener, I., & Niggli, A.


Evaluation of a Math Intervention Program Implemented With Community Support. (2019). Parker, D. C., Nelson, P. M., Zaslofsky, A. F., Kanive, R., Foegen, A., Kaiser, P., & Heisted, D.


Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Reading Interventions for
Students in the Primary Grades
. (2019). Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi, M.. Taylor & Francis Online


Effectiveness of an extracurricular program for struggling readers: A comparative study with parent tutors and volunteer tutors. Learning and Instruction. (2019). Villiger, C., Hauri, S., Tettenborn, A., Hartmann, E., Näpflin, C., Hugener, I., & Niggli, A.


Maths Counts Evaluation report and executive summary . (2018). See, B. H., Morris, R., Gorard S. G., Siddiqui, N.


Tutor Trust: Affordable Primary Tuition. Evaluation report and executive summary. (2018). Torgerson, C. J., Bell, K., Coleman, E., Elliott, L., Fairhurst, C., Gascoine, L., Hewitt, C.E., & Torgerson, D. J.


1stClass@Number. Evaluation report and executive summary. (2018). Nunes, T., Barros, R., Evangelou, M., Strand, S., Mathers, S., & Sanders-Ellis, D.